Editor’s Note (2026 Update):
Strong teams rarely happen by accident. As organizations continue to rely on cross-functional collaboration, leaders are increasingly focused on the behaviors that create trust, accountability, and shared results. This article revisits the five dysfunctions that can derail teams and offers practical ways to address them.
High performing teams, and the desire for them, is a common occurrence in corporations. While teams and groups are commonly used as synonyms, they are different from each other. Oxford Dictionary defines a team as a group of people who work together at a particular job while a group is defined as a number of people or things that are together in the same place.
As common as teams are in modern organizations, it should come as no surprise that some work better than others. Dysfunction in teams is all around. Behnam Tabrizi found that nearly 75% of cross-functional teams were dysfunctional. In his book, The Five Dysfunctions of A Team, leadership consultant Patrick Lencioni describes the most common breakdowns that prevent teams from working effectively. These dysfunctions are as follows:
- Absence of trust
- Fear of conflict
- Lack of commitment
- Avoidance of accountability
- Inattention to results
Why These Team Dysfunctions Matter
Lencioni’s model is widely used because it highlights that team performance problems rarely start with results. Instead, they usually begin with an absence of trust between team members. Without the basis of trust, dysfunctions will not be able to be resolved. Research from the Harvard Business Review found that people who work in places with high trust levels reported 106% more energy at work, 76% more engagement, 74% less stress, 40% less burnout, 50% higher productivity and 29% more satisfaction with their lives compared to those at a low trust workplace. Low trust workplaces often have to deal with, and navigate, office politics.
Resolving the absence of trust dysfunction is crucial to resolving the later dysfunctions. Each dysfunction is based on the resolution of the previous dysfunction and cannot be mastered out of order. For example, if your team shows lack of commitment, it is likely that there is also a fear of conflict from some, if not all of your team members. When a member doesn’t feel as though they can disagree and create conflict with a coworker, they will not be fully committed to the solution proposed because they were never able to weigh in their own opinions.
So how can you tell which dysfunction your team is stuck at and what can you do to resolve it? Here are some examples for each level:
Dysfunction #1 – Absence of Trust
Teams with absence of trust may:
- Not own up to mistakes made
- Not admit that they can’t do something to hide their weaknesses from other team members
- Be unwilling to go out of the realm of their job descriptions to help a coworker
What can you do to address it?
- Have team members be vulnerable and tell the team something about themselves then discuss as a team what you learned. This increases vulnerability between the team and makes it easier to continue to be vulnerable.
- Focus on everyone’s strengths. Doing this will help team members gain confidence in themselves and their work. This could inspire coworkers to appreciate the strengths and talents of their peers.
Addressing lack of trust can:
- Lead to quicker reaction to issues, now that mistakes can be admitted more openly
- Prevent mistakes before they happen if coworkers feel comfortable to ask for assistance on projects
Dysfunction #2 – Fear of Conflict
Teams that fear conflict may:
- Not listen to understand during a disagreement, rather listen to win the disagreement and argue their point
- Not converse with a coworker they disagree with and speak behind their backs
- Let leaders dominate a meeting and leave the meeting
- Display artificial harmony in which there is no conflict at all
What can you do to address it?
- Suggest an obviously bad idea and see if anyone in your team argues. If they don’t, there is a blatant fear of conflict.
- Show your team that having opposing views can be productive and helpful.
- Have a “devil’s advocate” portion of the meeting in which an opposing view can be argued.
- Thank team members for bringing up different points of view that may conflict with the consensus.
Addressing fear of conflict can:
- Lead to quicker resolution of issues
- Lessen the amount of office politics
- Allow more diverse views and lead to innovation
Dysfunction #3 – Lack of Commitment
Teams that have a lack of commitment may:
- Have members who don’t commit to an idea because it’s not their idea
- Have the false impression everyone is on the same page after leaving a meeting
- Mean members don’t contribute to the discussion because their ideas differ
What can you do to address it?
- Ask members if they have anything to add, any other ideas or (especially) differing opinions on the topic at hand.
- Encourage team members to ask questions for clarification.
- Set a team goal and have objectives for everyone to commit to.
Addressing lack of commitment can:
- Help the team understand why a goal is being addressed in a certain way
- Help members commit to an idea after being heard out about their own
- Show the main goal of the team and what is expected of team members
Dysfunction #4 – Avoidance of Accountability
Teams that have an avoidance of accountability may:
- Have peers who won’t hold each other accountable on performance and behavioral aspects
- Have leave leaders with the sole responsibility of discipline
- Include members not performing to the best of their ability
What can you do to address it?
- Start at the leadership level and call members out on their behavioral mistakes and let this trickle down to peer level.
- Regularly review team members’ individual performance and remind the team of the high standards expected.
- Have the team come together and share one thing for each member that could be improved to promote accountability between team members.
Addressing avoidance of accountability can:
- Lead to quicker and higher quality performance from the whole team
- Urge poor performers to improve performance
- Take some of the strain off of leaders
Dysfunction #5 – Inattention to Results
Teams that have an Inattention to Results:
- Don’t focus on the team as a whole when working on projects
- Attain personal goals more often than team goals.
- Fail to develop as a team
What can you do to address it?
- Have regular meetings to review key metrics
- Keep a scoreboard of some type that keeps the team updated on tasks that have been completed.
Addressing inattention to results can:
- Increase the amount of team goals hit
- Increase team work and minimize individualism in these settings
- Increase development as a team
Applying the Five Dysfunctions Framework in Real Teams
While many leaders recognize these dysfunctions in theory, addressing them within real teams can be more challenging.
Team development frameworks such as The Five Behaviors of a Cohesive Team build on Lencioni’s model and focus on helping teams strengthen the behaviors that lead to trust, productive conflict, commitment, accountability, and results.
At Evolved People Coaching, we work with leadership teams and cross-functional groups using this framework to help teams identify where dysfunction exists and develop practical strategies for improving collaboration.
These interactive workshops include:
- Individual and team assessments to understand team dynamics
- Facilitated exercises and discussions to build trust and communication
- Clear action plans that teams can immediately apply to improve performance
This type of structured team development helps organizations move from simply understanding the model to actually changing how teams work together.
Building a high-functioning team requires time, reflection, and consistent effort. By recognizing the dysfunctions that prevent teams from performing at their best, leaders can begin creating environments where trust, accountability, and shared results become the norm.
Organizations interested in strengthening collaboration and team effectiveness can explore team development workshops facilitated by Nicki Gilmour and Evolved People Coaching, which apply these principles in practical and engaging ways.
By Chloe Williams


