susan c.frunzi“I didn’t have a master plan or a clear vision of my career path,” explained Frunzi. “Instead I went with my gut instincts, I focused on the things I liked to do, and I knew that no decision I made was irrevocable.”

Following her instinct has been one of the most important lessons that Frunzi has learned and applied to her career. “Coming out of law school, I did not follow everyone who was chasing big firms. I had a hunch about Schulte Roth & Zabel –which was a smaller firm with about 50 lawyers at the time –and I felt like it was the right fit for me,” Frunzi said.

“If anyone told me that thirty years later I would still be here, I might have told them they were crazy, but I have enjoyed being part of the growth
of this firm and couldn’t imagine myself anywhere else,” she added. Today, Schulte Roth & Zabel is an AmLaw 100 law firm with 375 attorneys and offices in New York, Washington, D.C. and London.

Career Path

While in college, Frunzi weighed the options of attending either business or law school, and ultimately enrolled in law school at Columbia University. “If you go to business school, you can do a lot of things, but you can’t be a lawyer, and if you go to law school, you can choose to be a lawyer or work in business,” said Frunzi. After she started law school, Frunzi applied to business school at Columbia, and was accepted.

After her first year of law school, Frunzi worked at a large law firm and concentrated on antitrust and trade regulation because of her background in Economics. “Although I enjoyed it and learned a lot, I realized very quickly that I was not very passionate about this particular area of law,” noted Frunzi.

Frunzi came to Schulte Roth & Zabel in the summer following her second year of law school and had the opportunity to explore several different areas in order to determine which path she wanted to pursue. She explained, “What I love about trusts and estates is that I get to help individuals. This adds a different layer of complexity and can be challenging at times, but every day is different, the issues are extremely interesting, and I like and respect the people I work with.”

“What more could I ask for?” added Frunzi.
Frunzi indicates that there remains a gender leadership gap (though not at Schulte Roth & Zabel) in trusts and estates, an area in big law firms that tends to attract women. “I feel especially proud of the fact that I made partner eight years into my career, even though the cards might have been stacked against me at other firms,” stated Frunzi.

Currently, Frunzi helps a lot of individuals with different aspects of charitable planning, including creating and administering private foundations. According to Frunzi, it is very rewarding to help people negotiate the terms of substantial charitable gifts. “It is always interesting to see how the institution is viewing the gift versus how the client is viewing the gift, and finding the middle ground can be a challenge,” Frunzi noted.

Another issue Frunzi is interested in, and is very much involved with, is determining how trusts are administered among multiple generations within a family. “My role changes depending on whether I am representing a beneficiary or a trustee,” said Frunzi, “and often times I have to figure out how to navigate the family issues in addition to the standard legal issues that arise.”

Working closely with families on these personal matters is one the most interesting and complicated aspects of this area, said Frunzi, who noted that learning how to handle family dynamics is definitely something that comes with experience.

Throughout her career, Frunzi has always taken a lot of pride in developing the future talent at her firm. “Looking back at all of the help and guidance I had as a junior lawyer, I try to give back as much as I can,” said Frunzi, who feels a great sense of accomplishment from watching junior associates grow and mature in their career.

Women’s Leadership in Law

“It is a little different in trusts and estates,” remarked Frunzi, “and there are certainly plusses and minuses to being a woman in this area.” She noted that in her experience, she has encountered clients who only want to deal with a woman because they feel like a woman will be more inclined to understand the emotional side of the situation. On the other hand, some clients only want to work with men because they feel like men are more capable of handling the business aspects of the field.

Read more

By Melissa J. Anderson (New York City)

There are many organizational mechanisms that push women and people of color out of the professional workplace. Not least of these is a subtle, systemic bias toward white males that gives people who are part of the dominant group the benefit of the doubt, while those on the outside seemingly have to prove themselves over and over again.

Perhaps the most insidious factor driving women and minorities out of the professional workplace is the subtle, gnawing anxiety created by stereotype threat.

Dr. Maya Beasley, an associate professor of sociology at the University of Connecticut, has spent years studying the effects of stereotype threat. “Stereotype threat is the term given for the anxiety individuals get when they are in situations where there are negative stereotypes about how their particular group performs in those situations. There’s a pressure to perform well and not to represent the negative group stereotype,” she explained.

Studies have shown that this anxiety leads to decreased concentration, increased heart rate, and nausea, “factors which would make any one freeze up during a test,” Dr. Beasley commented. Ultimately the fear of conforming to the negative stereotype leads people to perform worse – essentially, they fulfill the stereotype because they are afraid of fulfilling the stereotype.

While much of the research on stereotype threat focuses on how it affects people during specific events – a math test, for example – Dr. Beasley believes stereotype threat can affect people over the course of their university study or professional careers. Her research suggests that stereotype threat is sapping STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) fields of diverse talent. “It leads people to disengage from a situation where they feel this kind of anxiety,” she explained.

But, she suggests, it doesn’t have to be this way. Stereotype threat is driving talented people away from the academic and professional world, and leaders of these institutions can and should do something about it.

Stereotype Threat in Organizations
According to Dr. Beasley’s work, stereotype threat is causing women and people of color to leave certain fields at an alarming rate. “My research suggests that stereotype threat is not just isolated to events like tests, but to prolonged experiences, like pursuing a course of study. There are strong pervasive stereotypes about the performance abilities of certain groups of people with respect to specific fields and people within these groups are pretty aware of them. This awareness leads students to question whether they want to avoid participation in the very activities that lead to success within these fields.”

For example, she says, “Someone may wonder whether a professor thinks their question is a bad one because they are Black or because they are female, and that might make them less likely to ask.”

Ultimately, this leads people in the minority to leave. “Women and minorities are just as likely as white males to pursue degrees in STEM fields at the beginning of college, but they leave these fields at a much greater rate than white men,” she said.

In her next book, Dr. Beasley is examining the results of stereotype threat in the professional workplace. She said, “In a domain like the corporate workplace that is highly biased and dominated by white men, there are a number of stereotypes at play, for example that women or Asian Americans are meek, or that African Americans and Hispanics are hot-headed or prone to violence. It’s likely that these groups have encountered stereotypes growing up or on college campuses, and they are likely to encounter them at work. Trying to cultivate a contrary identity can be tiresome and it’s hard to shrug a stereotype off.”

There’s also research to support that when people behave contrary to a stereotype, they may be penalized. “For example, studies show that women who are aggressive are not rewarded in the same way as men.”

Eventually, the stress and anxiety of dealing with stereotypes day in and day out can cause talented people to leave the corporate workplace for a more inviting environment. “Most women and minorities tend to recognize that dealing with stereotypes is literally exhausting,” she said. “At some point, women and people of color are tired of warding off stereotypes and they may seek out a situation that is safer or where stereotypes are less pervasive.”

Read more

iStock_000006665839XSmallBy Nneka Orji

Over the years I have become convinced that we learn best—and change—from hearing stories that strike a chord within us…Those in leadership positions who fail to grasp or use the power of stories risk failure for their companies and for themselves.” John Kotter

The idea that storytelling can be a powerful tool to convey important messages and inspire is not new, but its impact in a business context is only more recently gaining traction with the wider management community. While data and analysis go some way in convincing audiences of the need to act, on their own they have limited impact on inspiring the audience to act.

Make an Impression, Make an Impact
According to Paul Smith, author of Lead with a Story: A Guide to Crafting Business Narratives that Captivate, Convince, and Inspire, stories are a powerful tool which leaders can use effectively to inspire an organisation, set a vision, teach important lessons, define the culture and values, and explain who the leader is and what his / her beliefs are. Smith provides examples where organisations have not only acknowledged the importance of storytelling, but have invested in developing storytelling skills across their leadership team. For example, Proctor & Gamble brought in Hollywood movie directors to teach their executives and a number of Motorola’s leadership belong to improvisational or theatre groups. By formulating their messages as stories, executives were in a stronger position to lead organisational change and influence delicate issues like diversity and inclusion.

Storytelling can also be instrumental in improving employee engagement, both in the short and long term. For organisations looking to identify and develop the next generation of leaders, the leadership’s ability to engage and inspire must be at the core of their talent strategy. In a 2002 article for the MIT Sloan Management Review, Douglas Ready states that “storytelling by a company’s senior executives is a way of providing potential leaders with the necessary context from respected role models.”

Uri Hasson’s research with his Princeton team also demonstrated the power of storytelling; when telling a story, the storyteller can directly influence the brain activity of each audience member to map the storyteller’s brain activity. In the study, when the storyteller’s insula (emotional brain region) was activated, activity was also seen in the insula of the listeners. Paul Zak’s work on oxytocin-rich environments also highlights how personal connections through storytelling and other means evoke empathy across employees and customers, leading to “better business.”

What does this mean for leaders who are trying to influence organisations through periods of change? To ensure employees join their executives on the organisation’s change journey, leaders must take their employees on the emotional journey too. And they can do this through storytelling.

Don’t Just Tell, Do
While storytelling by leaders has been shown to be successful, Ty Montague (CEO of co:collective) argues that storydoingTM is the differentiator. In addition to telling the stories, leaders and organisations need to engrain the stories in their organisation through their strategies and direct action. Based on Montague’s studies (during 2007-2011), storydoingTM organisations see improved performance; annualised revenue growth rate is 4.3% higher than those of storytellers, social media mentions for storydoers was twenty times greater, and share price growth between was positive compared to negative for storytellers. StorydoingTM companies such as Red Bull, TOMS shoes and NIKE are outperforming storytellers like Dr. Pepper, Reebok and Adidas.

If a leader or an organisation cannot reflect the ideals or key messages of their story in their action, the story cannot have the intended impact. Blake Mycoskie, CEO of TOMS Shoes – a storydoer, also highlights that a good story and corresponding action, will lead to further sharing of the story: “I realised the importance of having a story today is really what separates companies. People don’t just wear our shoes, they tell our stories.”

Telling a Good Tale
According to Jeremy Hsu’s Scientific American article, 65% of our conversations are made up of personal anecdotes and gossip. If this is indeed the case, we all need to ensure that the stories we tell, and more importantly the stories others tell of us, reflect ourselves and our goals.

So, how do we tell a good tale in a business context?

In a video on the Lean In community, Professor Jennifer Aaker, Stanford Graduate School of Business states that stories are twenty-two times more memorable than facts. This encourages us to use stories, but just as a good story will be remembered more than a fact, likewise a bad story will also stick.

According to Aaker, a good story has four elements: goal (why tell the story), grab attention (why would the audience listen), engage (why would the audience care), enable action (why would they share the story). By ensuring your story includes all these elements, you can narrow the gap between the way in which others view you and how you view yourself. To assess the success of your story, confirm whether your audience has changed their view of you, whether they better understand your position on the subject, or empathises with you and your cause.

If your story has not had the desired impact, take the time to work on it and practice it. Like all skills, especially leadership skills, good storytelling is the result of practice.

Read more

Young woman gesturing positive business perspective.By Irene Solaz

Now that, the UK’s most historical player in the insurance business, Lloyd’s of London, chose Inga Beale as a replacement for long-time chief executive Richard Ward can we expect to see other big insurance firms to follow suit with a female CEO?

Beale’s credentials are definitely solid, with 30 years of experience in the insurance industry, making her a great choice as the first female CEO of Lloyd’s, a company with 325 years of experience.

Insurance is a particularly interesting segment to examine, as even within financial services, it is perceived as being most flooded with straight, white guys. This perception was solidified thanks to a live poll conducted during the June 2013 Insurance Industry Charitable Foundation (IICF) Global Women in Insurance Conference. Ninety-eight percent of male and female respondents said that gender inequality still exists in the insurance industry and nearly half said the lack of C-Suite recognition and sponsorship is the top issue that must be confronted to elevate this statistic. More than 30 percent said their company does nothing to source more female talent.

Have Things Really Changed?
A 2012 study by Saint Joseph’s University Academy of Risk Management and Insurance concluded that only 6 percent of top executive positions were held by women. However, these numbers do not entirely reflect the experiences of women in the insurance industry who have achieved success in their firms. This industry can be ideal for women. Insurance dominated the 2012 version of the National Association for Female Executives’ (NAFE) ranking of the Top 50 Companies for Executive Women.

Read more

womanladder.JPGBy Michele Drayton

This past April 2014, the National Association of Women Business Owners (NAWBO) Chicago Chapter held its 31st Annual Celebration of Achievement Luncheon in Chicago, marking the 35th anniversary of the chapter’s founding and showcasing the accomplishments of corporate executives and entrepreneurs.

Keynote speaker Carla A. Harris recounted how when she came to Wall Street in 1987, she felt that she had the smarts and work ethic that appeared to guarantee success. Realizing quickly that this would take her only so far, she reached for her “pearls,” or career strategies that propelled her to success. She shared them before a rapt audience of nearly 500 women and men at the event.

Leading in Turbulent Times
“If you consider yourself a leader in the 21st century, you must be comfortable taking risks,” said Harris, commanding the center of the stage as she discussed one of her pearls. “In the environment we’ve had for the last six years everyone else may be ducking, but you have to have clear vision to see opportunity. Now is not the time to keep your head down. When you submerge your voice you become irrelevant.”

The women who are fearless as turmoil ensues – Harris cited GM CEO Mary Barra, Xerox Chairman and CEO Ursula Burns and HP President and CEO Meg Whitman – reinforce the fact that uncertain circumstances can produce uncommon victories.

Even amid the economic doldrums reflected in a 6.7 percent unemployment rate, Harris urged women to take the lead on a new project or recommend a process improvement. Those actions demonstrate relevance, and colleagues and stakeholders will take notice and say: “She’s trying to put points on the board. She’s moving the ball down the field. She is a keeper,” Harris said.

Crafting Your Personal Brand
A Wall Street veteran for nearly 27 years, Harris is Vice Chairman of Wealth Management, Senior Client Advisor and Managing Director at Morgan Stanley in New York. She is the author of the book, Expect to Win, her playbook for workplace success.

One insight Harris learned early involves understanding the importance of workplace perception. For example, a woman aiming for a P&L role will not get tapped for that position unless colleagues see her as quantitative, analytical and strategic. Harris advised audience members to select three words they want colleagues to use to describe them when they are not in the room, where decisions are made about hiring, promotion and compensation.

Recounting her own experience, Harris remembered a senior colleague telling her she wasn’t “tough” enough for investment banking. Instead of rebuffing the colleague, Harris, who earned two degrees from Harvard, changed her modus operandi. For the ensuing 90 days, she told the audience, she walked tough, talked tough and used the adjective to describe herself in conversation. Soon, she heard colleagues take into account how “tough” she was as they prepped for meetings with her.

“You can train people in the way you want them to think about you,” said Harris, recently installed as Chair of the National Women’s Business Council.

Know Yourself
Harris also recommended that audience members be authentic on the job because in relationship-driven business it opens up the opportunity to connect with a client on a different level. She related her experience. Before making a formal pitch for Burger King’s $300 million IPO, she asked the client whether the company planned to bring back both verses of the “Have It Your Way” jingle. The client insisted the jingle had only one verse until Harris sang both. Morgan Stanley got the account and Harris maintained a working relationship with the client.

This pearl? “Nobody can be you the way that you can be you,” said Harris, who has produced gospel CDs and sung at Carnegie Hall. “It is your distinct competitive advantage.” Most people aren’t comfortable in their own skin and they will gravitate toward people who are, she added.

Harris brought her message full circle with her most important pearl, what some might call faith. Women should accept that the answers to the most daunting workplace challenges are within their reach by way of their intelligence, their professional experience and their network. “If you expect to win, you will,’’ Harris said, as audience members at the sold-out event stood to applaud.

Read more

jennifer anglia“My career journey is certainly not linear,” said Jennifer Taglia, “but it has taken me to a place where I am enjoying what I am doing and I am learning something new all of the time.”
Taglia advises young professionals to seek similar professional fulfillment by taking responsibility for their own career path. “Don’t sit back and wait for things to happen to you,” said Taglia, “instead, be proactive, take initiative and create opportunities for your own career advancement.”

Career Story

Taglia started her career in operations on the sell side of UBS Investment Bank recruited right out of school. Here, she was exposed to foreign exchange, interest rates, precious metals, and derivatives in support of institutional business. After three years at UBS, Taglia decided that she wanted to gain more exposure to the rest of the business.

This desire to learn and grow prompted her move to the buy side at GE Asset Management, where she managed the equity operations team and later joined the Lean Six Sigma Quality Team. Taglia spent about six years in this cross business six sigma project management role and was exposed to many different processes across multiple sections of the business.

During this time, Taglia earned her Master Black Belt in Lean Six Sigma and went on to become a project manager in a product and marketing role. After relocating to Phoenix, AZ for a brief time, Taglia returned to the New York City area where she was offered a position at ING U.S. She came to ING U.S. as a project manager supporting the client business, and stayed in this role for about two years before an opportunity presented itself that would simultaneously challenge her and elevate her career to a new level.

“When the head of the RFP team resigned, I was put in charge of keeping the team running smoothly while they searched for a replacement,” explained Taglia, who spent a couple of months in this interim role. “It became clear to me that my experience, knowledge and ability to do a deep dive on processes could be an asset here, but that I also had the opportunity to learn and grow.”

She continued, “I was not an expert on everything that the role demanded, but I was confident in my ability to improve the process and improve the team.” This confidence helped Taglia transition permanently into the Head of RFP role where she has been for nearly three years.

The lengthy and complex process of rebranding ING U.S. Investment Management to Voya Investment Management was completed on May 1 and Jennifer and her team played a large part. “It is definitely a rare opportunity to be part of a complete rebranding, “Taglia explained, “and it has been very exciting to be involved in this change and to ensure that the process went smoothly.”

“Being successful in this role is something I am very proud of,” Taglia noted, “because it combines all of my strengths and past experiences while enabling me to take my career in a new and rewarding direction.”

On Thriving Professionally

According to Taglia, one of the most important components of her personal success has been maintaining a healthy work-life balance. “Having support at work and at home is a key factor for me,” said Taglia, who is married with two children.

Read more

We are enjoying our annual publishing summer break, working hard behind the scenes to bring you useful and insightful career news and advice and great networking events for the rest of the summer, fall, and beyond.

We will be back on Monday the 14th with more profiles and articles and in the meantime, do enjoy a selection of our recent pieces.

  • Does Being LGBT Still Matter or Are We in a Post-Bias World at Work?
  • Sallie Krawcheck and Pax World Offer Women’s Global Equality Fund
  • The Glass Hammer’s 7th Annual Top Women on the Buy-Side Breakfast
  • The Imposter Syndrome: Why Owning Your Success is Critical to Your Career
  • How Being an Athlete Can Help Women Advance in Business
  • Are you a writer or an expert in the industry and would like to become a Glass Hammer writer? Contact jilliane@theglasshammer.com to discuss opportunities and learn more information about becoming part of the stellar TGH team!

    And don’t forget to check out our Facebook page, group, twitter page, and subscribe to our newsletter in the meantime!

    iStock_000001913448XSmallDear Readers,

    The Glass Hammer is celebrating this Fourth of July with a short publishing break. For our U.S. readers, we hope you are able to enjoy some down time as well. For the rest of our great readership, we will be back on Monday the 14th with more profiles, articles, and network events for you!

    In the mean time, here are some of our favorite articles in 2014:

  • Thought Leaders: Donna Parisi on the Derivatives Industry
  • Black Women in Business: An Update on Progress
  • Op-Ed: Why What Your Company Does The Other 364 Days of the Year Beyond International Women’s Day is What Matters
  • Asian-American Women and the Bamboo Ceiling
  • Dare to Compete: Leadership Lessons From Hillary Clinton
  • Are you a writer or an expert in the industry and would like to become a Glass Hammer writer? Contact jilliane@glasshammer2.wpengine.com to discuss opportunities and learn more information about becoming part of the stellar TGH team!

    And don’t forget to check out our Facebook page, group, twitter page, and subscribe to our newsletter in the meantime!

    women shaking handsThe main discussion at last week’s Top Women on the Buy-Side event for senior women in investment management focused on the evolution of the industry following the 2008 financial crisis and subsequent market recovery. But perhaps the strongest statements centered on the importance of networking for top-level women in the space.

    The sold out event – hosted in New York by The Glass Hammer – was the 7th annual networking breakfast and panel in the popular series and was moderated by Donna Parisi, partner and co-head of the asset management group at the law firm Shearman & Sterling. Panelists included Nanette Buziak, managing director and head of equity trading at Voya Investment Management; Daphne Karydas, senior equity analyst and co-portfolio manager at The Boston Company; Vivian Lau, partner at Serengeti Asset Management; and Susan Soh, partner and global head of marketing and client services at Perella Weinberg Partners.

    Challenges and Opportunities in 2014

    Donna Parisi opened the dialogue by commenting on the low yield environment and noting that just the day before the event the Fed announced that amid declining unemployment, it would keep short-term interest rates low for the time being.

    Liquidity was on the panelists’ minds, as well as market competition and when asked what challenges and opportunities lay ahead, the panelists eagerly began the discussion.

    “There’s still a lot that needs to be repaired in the US, but US equities look cheap on a valuation basis compared to other asset classes on a global basis” Buziak said. She continued, “There’s a lot of pressure on fees right now, and in equities, we’re seeing competition from ETFs and index funds.”

    Speaking from the alternatives perspective, Soh said, “While ETFs may pose a challenge for some, we believe it’s been an interesting opportunity because it’s created more demand for alternative products in the form of liquid alts, which is great for firms like ours.” Meanwhile, she continued, “In light of the low interest rate environment we’re seeing, hedge fund managers are finding it more difficult to generate the outsize returns that they have historically. There’s a greater focus on yield, current income and niche opportunities where one can generate outsized returns.”

    Karydas noted that, especially in a difficult environment, being creative is important. But she encouraged attendees to avoid what she called “style drift,” where some portfolio managers are pursuing new strategies to drive returns even though they might be outside the bounds of what clients initially signed up for.

    “You have to be true to what you say you are doing, especially in a bad year,” she said.

    Customers are demanding more transparency, Lau agreed. “Investors want to understand what they are paying for,” she said. Heightened regulations are part of this trend, but so is the desire for differentiation. “They want to know: are you delivering returns in a fashion I can’t get anywhere else?”

    Read more

    iStock_000003731985XSmallBy Beth Senko

    Women’s financial clout is growing and Sallie Krawcheck and Pax World are partnering to invest in the trend by investing in the very companies that are paving the way for women’s success.

    In June, Pax World Management LLC and Ellevate Asset Management LLC announced that they have entered into a partnership agreement to manage and distribute the first and only mutual fund in the United States that focuses on investing in companies that are global leaders in advancing women. The fund, Pax Ellevate Global Women’s Index Fund, is a successor fund to the Pax World Global Women’s Equality Fund.

    Krawcheck formed Ellevate Asset Management LLC (formerly 85 Broads) with impact investing and asset management executive Allyson McDonald. Ellevate Asset has an ownership investment in the new effort (Pax Ellevate Management LLC) and Krawcheck will sit on the board of trustees of the Fund.

    Pax World President and CEO Joe Keefe gave The Glass Hammer additional insight into the new fund, its strategy, and the opportunity for investors.

    The Glass Hammer: The Pax World Women’s Global Equality Fund was re-launched in 2010 with some changes. Is this an evolutionary step, or is this a new direction?

    Joe Keefe: The shareholders of the Pax World Global Women’s Equality Fund approved a merger into the Pax Ellevate Global Women’s Index Fund, which was formally launched on June 4. The major difference between the predecessor fund and the new fund is that the prior fund was actively managed (that is, a portfolio manager actively bought and sold stocks) whereas the re-launched fund follows an index-based strategy (that is, the fund buys and holds a fixed basket of stocks). We had long felt that an index-based strategy might be the best way to measure the contributions and capture the investment returns associated with gender diversity in business, but no such index existed. So, we built one. The Pax Global Women’s Leadership Index – a customized index calculated by MSCI – is comprised of the most highly-rated companies in the world in advancing women’s leadership on boards and in executive management, as rated by Pax World Gender Analytics. The Pax Ellevate Global Women’s Index Fund invests in the 400 plus companies comprising that index. So, in one sense this is an evolution and in another it’s a new departure. Certainly, we have built the first and only index comprised of, and launched the first and only mutual fund investing in, the most highly-rated companies in the world in advancing women’s leadership.

    TGH: The Pax Ellevate fund uses the term index, but is it seeking to perform relative to the index or actually replicate the index?

    JK: The fund actually follows what some call an enhanced index or smart beta strategy. The index is a market capitalization-weighted index. The fund invests in all 406 companies in the index but gives added weight to companies with higher gender diversity scores, so the company weightings in the fund are different than the weightings in the index. Research suggests that where women are better represented on boards and in executive management, companies often display stronger long-term financial performance. The Pax Ellevate Global Women’s Index Fund is premised on that research. Now, you will be able to make an apples-to-apples comparison between the market as a whole, on the one hand, and the best companies for advancing women, on the other. Now, if you agree that women should be better represented in corporate leadership, you have an opportunity to invest in those companies where they are indeed better represented. We hope, over time, to be able to demonstrate that these companies with greater gender diversity in leadership are actually better long-term investments.

    TGH: Standards for gender-positive practices vary by country and industry. Is the goal to pick only the best companies worldwide, or will the investments be examined relative to local/industry standards?

    JK: We do make some adjustments based on local/regional standards, although, with respect to industry and sector, we let the chips fall where they may and make no effort to remain industry- or sector-neutral vs. MSCI World or other global indices. Some regional or country differences are accounted for in the way we score for gender diversity. For example, women hold very few board seats in Japan but we wanted some Japanese representation in the fund, so the thresholds used for Japanese companies are somewhat different from, say, the threshold used for most European companies.

    TGH: Will there be a place in the fund to recognize companies that may not be best-in-class but are moving in that direction?

    JK: This fund is more about best practices than best intentions. Companies have to demonstrate a commitment to advancing women as evidenced by a number of criteria, including, most importantly, gender diversity on their board and in executive management. In some of our other funds at Pax World, although of which incorporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria into portfolio construction, we may give some weight to improving performance or aspirational factors. In the Pax Ellevate Global Women’s Index Fund, however, you have to be a leader to qualify for inclusion in the index and in the fund.

    TGH: Is this fund aimed primarily at individuals or do you see an institutional market for this product as well?

    JK: We think the fund should be attractive to both individual and institutional investors. Moreover, we don’t view this fund as simply a thematic fund or a niche product. This is a broadly diversified, global index-based strategy and we believe the fund can be considered as a core holding in many investor portfolios.
    ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

    The rise of the female investor is a theme that has been in the news for a number of years. A study by Russell Investments notes that women control 51% of the private wealth in the U.S., or $8 trillion. That figure is expected to grow women’s wealth at $8 trillion, a number that is forecasted to grow to $22 trillion by 2020. More importantly, women are more likely to invest in companies that do well by doing good. U.S. Trust’s Women and Wealth series found that “65% of women think it is important to consider the positive or negative social, political, and/or environmental impact of the companies they invest in.” And for women, the study indicates that investing for women is not all about the money; “Women feel so strongly about the social impact of their investments, that two-thirds (56%), compared to 44% of men, would be willing to accept a lower return from investments in companies that have a greater positive social impact.” While a number of investment managers are capitalizing on untapped potential for women investors, creating a product designed to fit how women invest in Pax Ellevate is likely to set itself apart from the crowd.