Contributed by Alana Elsner

2059900256_da1ba08e96_m.jpgThis is a tale of two women, exactly three decades and one pond removed. One is the United Kingdom’s first female prime minister, Margaret Thatcher; the other, America’s first serious female presidential contender, Hillary Clinton. Both bobbed their hair and prepared for battle. Gender was a much-examined factor in both races, and the public was forced to consider the role of women in executive power. But identity politics did not tell the whole story, and both candidates were evaluated on the strength of their policy positions.

Looking back at both women’s campaigns reveals subtle nuances about the portrayal of femininity in leadership. Believing that men and women rule in the same way is a little like convincing yourself that a pantsuit compliments your figure. Just as women do not fit perfectly into men’s clothes, they cannot easily be placed into a same executive leadership style.

Read more

Contributed by Michelle Kedem, Partner, On-Ramps

To build upon yesterday’s Voice of Experience piece about the Columbia Business School conference, we invited one of the speakers, Michelle Kedem of On-Ramps, to share her experience and offer some insights about work/life balance.

765603196_8504d17bce_m.jpg I was recently invited to speak at Columbia Business School’s annual Women in Business conference. The topic of this year’s conference was “Success… Your Way: Share Your Vision and Find Your Voice.” As often happens, many of the panel discussions, regardless of the specified matters at hand, turned to the work-life topic. At the networking event at the end of the day, one of the attendees asked the question on everyone’s mind: “Why do women in business spend so much time obsessing over work-life fit? And why don’t men spend an equal amount of time focused on the tricky navigation of a personal life while excelling in their careers?”

Read more

A few weeks ago, we ran a story about the Pace Law School New Directions program for lawyers returning to practice after taking some time off. It turns out that a similar program exists for women returning to careers in finance. Sponsored by Goldman Sachs, the program is also called New Directions. The Goldman Sachs program began in 2006, and the Pace Law School program was launched in May 2007. At The Glass Hammer, we are just pleased that such excellent opportunities for returners exist in both law and finance. Last week, we had a chance to sit down with Elana Weinstein, Vice President in the Office of Global Leadership and Diversity at Goldman Sachs, and discuss their New Directions program.

Read more

Contributed by Dr. Jane Linder, President, Progress Board LLC.

A few weeks ago, I was addressing a gathering of the Finance Women’s Association in New York City. They invited me because of my book, Spiral Up, which talks about the surprising lessons we have to learn from wildly successful initiatives. It turns out that conventional “good management practice” seems to be exactly the wrong way to go if you want to accomplish amazing things. So the brought me in to share some good stories and counter-intuitive advice.

Read more

Sex In The City glamorized the image of the urban single woman, with a gorgeous apartment, a stylish wardrobe, an exciting life and means to pay for it all. Television has elevated the archetype of the powerful professional women to a cultural icon. With the premieres this season of Cashmere Mafia and Lipstick Jungle, two more sexy dramas about upwardly mobile women in their 30s, successful females have finally hit the limelight.

Ever notice that, on these shows, the characters always live in unrealistically spectacular apartments? Do you wonder if real women in a similar situation can afford to own such nice digs? Well, art must be imitating life because as women move up the corporate ladder, they also move up the property ladder.

Read more

CIMG0571.JPGIt was standing room only at London Business School on January 31, 2008, as executives from around London came to hear tips and stories from four senior women who have risen through the ranks while working flexibly. Kate Grussing, Managing Director and Founder of Sapphire Partners, moderated the panel. Some advice recurred throughout the evening:

Read more

Contributed by Gary M. Stern

268912393_1dc14bdaed_m_1.jpgIf you listen to news reports about the subprime mortgage mess, you’d think the job market in finance is all gloom and doom. While opportunities in mortgages will be limited for some time, leading executive recruiters and career experts say that jobs are still out there for women in finance who possess the right skills and background. Here’s what financial insiders advise on where the job growth will be in 2008.

Opportunities in money and wealth management
Asked where the major opportunities are in 2008, Kim Bishop, a New York-based senior client partner at Korn/Ferry International, a global executive search firm, said that she’s seeing steady growth in wealth and money management firms. Firms are hiring in finance “across the board and that includes business development, client service, financial planners and advisors,” she said.

But a leading female executive recruiter of a boutique firm in New York who requested anonymity said, “The subprime crisis is affecting other areas. If financial buyers can’t finance acquisitions, the market will be slower.” She sees opportunities cropping up in the next six months but envisions a tight, challenging marketplace.

Dealmakers: please apply
Venture capital (VC) and private equity (PE) firms continue to offer opportunity, Bishop suggested. VC and PE firms seek women who have experience in “deal-making including initiating and executing deals” are in demand. Though several articles noted that private equity firms operate like men’s’ clubs, Bishop emphasized that these firms “are looking for the best talent in the world and will select whoever is best qualified,” gender not a factor.

Read more

justice_scales.gifIt used to be that big law firms were the old guard of the inflexible work day. Tied to the holy grail, the universal unit of measurement – otherwise known as the billable hour – law firms were late adopters of work-life balance innovations like flex-time and part-time schedules for working moms. But as the number of hours billed by the average associate crept up from 1600, flying past 1800, scooting by 2000 with little fanfare, and sneaking across the line of 2200, the misery quotient of young lawyers of both genders went up and so did attrition rates, particularly of female associates, who viewed life at a big law firm as incompatible with the possibility of starting a family.

A widely circulated article in the New York Times earlier this month, called “The Falling Down Professions,” documented the rising dissatisfaction and falling prestige of lawyers (and doctors), observing that more young people that ever aspired to the get-rich-quick ideals of jobs in finance, or the flexibility and creativity of entrepreneurship, without the years of arduous professional training and comparatively lower paychecks of “the professions.”

One step that big law firms in major markets have taken in recent years is to give associates raises: big ones. When the Class of 2006 was working as summer associates, they were looking forward to joining firms at the not-too-shabby salary of $120,000 per annum. After they got back to school for their 3L year, they got some good news: salaries had been increased to $135,000. By the time these lucky new lawyers started their first grown up jobs, starting salaries for first year associates had risen to $160,000. Said one Harvard Law grad upon hearing the news of yet another raise before he had logged a single billable hour, “I feel like I won the lottery!”

Read more

I’ve been thinking about competition and how it acts as a force for change. In the bear markets we face today, I began with who the competitors in the field are, and how their roles and interactions shape the market. Recently, we have seen a trend towards consolidating the power of stock and futures exchanges and reducing competition in the market. For example, the big rivalry between futures exchanges in Chicago spawned the largest futures exchange in the world. The New York competitors, NYSE Euronext and the American Stock Exchange joined forces recently. In Canada, we see the Toronto Stock Exchange gaining control of its main competitor, the Montreal Exchange.

With all these mergers taking place in the markets, where is the competition going? The Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) Group admitted that the purpose of their collaboration was to compete with NYSE Euronext on that level of the playing field. In this sense, as the global markets develop so does the competition. But, as the former titans of exchange join forces to better compete on the global stage, they reduce competition within markets.

Then we have the smaller firms getting in on the action as well. To compete with the CME Group in the futures market, heavy hitting investment banks have started forming teams to compete with the future exchanges. While this strategy has had skeptics from the start, their large Chicago rival CME Group acknowledged the purpose of these in-house competitors when they upgraded their platforms to reduce the time to market for block trading as well as the time it takes to make a trade.

Read more

Contributed by Rebecca Chong

The social networking website Facebook has become an increasingly popular way to resolve the time consuming and financially intensive burden of socialising, and brings it straight to the monitors of the internet generation, including at work. Indeed, many employees whose companies do not restrict access to the internet while away the days surfing the web, posting pictures to their Facebook accounts and reconnecting with friends in the virtual world.

Employers are now divided between embracing this new opportunity for marketing on a global scale (even princess of pop Kylie Minogue has launched ‘KylieKonnect’ a social networking site), and a cautiousness bred from the early ages of the blog; which led to media horror stories of employees flaunting their right to free speech and publishing derogatory pieces about their employers for the world to see.

The line for the employer to draw depends on business objectives; but for every successful business, evaluating how to tailor employment practices for the changes brought on by the growing impact of online social networking is vital to development.

A free subscription to socialize for the employee may come at a heavy price to employers. A recent study by Peninsula found that companies in the UK lose £132 million a day in lost productivity to employees wasting valuable time on Facebook. The ease with which a lot of employees are able to browse the net inevitably gives rise to temptation to do so during work hours and for lengthy periods that would be impossible to expend on most other extra curricular activities. Only last month, Neath Port Talbot Council dismissed three of their employees for spending too much of their working day dealing on the auction site eBay.

Time wasters are not the only concern. Facebook and its kin enable employees to disseminate confidential information easily, albeit unwittingly. Through personal profiles which may include job details, they make themselves vulnerable to being targeted by unscrupulous ‘cyber sharks’, or by competing businesses hoping to learn from the eyes and ears of the opposition.

Read more