By Liz O’Donnell (Boston)Young beautiful business lady standing in a suit

In an effort to support and promote women looking to become Chief Financial Officers, Deloitte Consulting LLP interviewed 15 of the top women CFOs in the United States and Europe. The firm asked a series of questions including:

  • What were the significant moments in your journey to becoming a CFO and your current role?
  • What are the skills important to being a CFO, and how did you acquire them?
  • What advice would you give other aspiring women professionals on managing their journey to leadership?

Deloitte wanted to understand what career paths, key relationships, traits and decisions led to these women joining the top ranks of financial professionals. The results are published in the report entitled “The Journey to CFO: Perspectives from women leaders.”

Read more

by Liz O’Donnell (Boston)

Does Wall Street prefer female CFOs to male CFOs? While it’s unlikely the financial world will make that claim any time soon, new research out of Boston College indicates the street responds more favorably to financial moves made by companies where the CFO is a woman. David Kisgen, an assistant professor at Boston College co-authored the Gender and Corporate Finance study with Jiekun Huang a Ph.D. candidate at Boston College. The study looked at public companies with at least $500 million in assets between 1994 and 2005. Kisgen and Huang tracked CFO’s performance’s from the time they transitioned into the role and then for three years after. Kisgen wanted to conduct the CFO study because there is so little research examining whether gender plays a role in corporate decisions and there aren’t enough women CEOs to study.

The Gender and Corporate Finance study examined whether men and women differ in corporate financial decisions. What Ksigen and Huang found is that firms with female CFOs are less likely to make acquisitions and are less likely to issue debt than firms with male CFOs. Female CFOs are less likely to make significant changes to capital structure in general and reduce leverage more than male CFOs. Male capital structure decisions are as likely to move a firm toward its target leverage as those made by female CFOs. However, announcement returns are higher around acquisitions, debt offerings and equity offerings when the firm has a female CFO. The study makes the conclusions that women make different corporate finance decisions than men and that, “…the better announcement returns suggest female CFOs do a better job of maximizing shareholder value, at least along those particular dimensions.”

Paul Santinelli, a General Partner with North Bridge Venture Partners, says gender is not a factor when he evaluates a CFO. Santinelli looks at three things: domain expertise, financial experience and strong moral and ethics. As far as financial experience, Santinelli examines, “What has this person done in the rank and file to get to this position?” Morals and ethics are important to Santinelli because, “It is not too difficult screw up a good thing inside a company. Besides, CFOs usually run Operations, Human Resources and Finance. Governance and compliance issues are far more extreme than they were ten years ago.”

Santinelli’s criteria could bode well for women. Kisgen says one possible take away from the study is that female CFOS are careful and risk-averse and that the market responds favorably to the moves they do make. He says another possible take away is that women CFOS are higher quality, as they have had to overcome discriminatory hiring practices to get to a C-level position.

crackedglass.JPGby Liz O’Donnell (Boston)

Slim to none. These three words sum up the gains women have made in board rooms and executive suites according to the recent report, “Planning For Tomorrow’s Boardroom: Making Room For More Women.” The report was published by ION, InterOrganization Network, an alliance of twelve women’s organizations in California, Chicago, Florida, Georgia, Kansas/Missouri, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Tennessee, New York, Philadelphia and Wisconsin. ION studied the number of women on the boards of 1,336 public corporations in the twelve regions listed above. We have previously reported on the individual state reports from Massachusetts, California and Florida.

Read more

JusttheOpt_In_logo_medium.jpgby Anna T. Collins, Esq (Portland, Maine)

When I first interviewed Patricia Gillette, an employment law expert and partner at Orrick in San Francisco, I noticed two things about the way she spoke about the future of the legal profession. First, despite the temptation to point fingers when discussing the ever-present wage gap in the legal profession, Pat Gillette focused on solutions. Second, she was optimistic about the possibility of change in the profession, especially due to the shifting economic reality. In Pat’s view, for example, women may be at an advantage as firms shift away from hourly fee structures – a shift that may be inevitable as the economy turns sour for law firms and clients. Women lawyers, in Pat’s experience, are at times more efficient at completing assignments. While the current billable hours system may not value the fact that they are able to complete work quickly, the legal profession of the future is likely to value this type of efficiency.

Pat’s focus on solutions and optimistic view of the possibilities for both women and men becomes less surprising and more poignant when one considers her work as co-founder of the Opt-In Project. The Project was partly a response to various articles published around 2003, which all examined what has been coined the “Opt-Out Revolution.” In articles such as “The Case for Staying Home,” “Mommy Madness,” and the infamous “The Opt-Out Revolution,” authors depicted the “trend” of women obtaining the highest levels of education, entering the workforce in record numbers, and then choosing to leave.

The founders of the Opt-In Project wanted to test the “Opt-Out” conclusion against the theory that women were actually being pushed out of the workplace. The ultimate mission of the Opt-In Project, created in 2006, was to “tap into the wisdom of industry leaders to find innovative strategies for the retention of professional women in the workforce.” Ultimately, the goal of the Project was to create a forum to take the discussion to the next level: Are there more sweeping measures that should be considered to create greater career sustainability for both women and men?

Despite its ambitious nature, the Project cannot be described as anything other than “a success.” Over a period of an entire year, the Opt-In Project brought more than 900 people together from a variety of industries for events in San Francisco, Silicon Valley, Washington, D.C., and New York. Industry experts started each evening by presenting their ideas for improving retention and leadership opportunities for women. The conversation was then turned over to participants for smaller group discussions, which generated many ideas. These ideas, which are summarized below, are described in full detail in the Opt-In Project Report. The Report is available at the Opt In Project website.

Read more

Accenture_Womens_Research_U.gifby Liz O’Donnell (Boston)

Women may feel unchallenged at work but that isn’t stopping them from taking risks and proactively managing their own careers. According to new research from Accenture, almost half of female business professionals around the world (and a similar number of men) believe they are insufficiently challenged. Yet these same women feel confident in their skills and capabilities.

The global consulting firm reported this information after surveying 3,600 professionals in medium to large organizations in 18 countries across Europe, Asia, North America, South America and Africa. Forty-six percent of the women surveyed said they are not significantly challenged in their current roles. This, despite the fact these respondents feel confident in their abilities to manage their workloads, meet deadlines, delegate and negotiate.

The survey also revealed that 59 percent of the women believe their careers are successful or very successful and that their jobs require them to stretch beyond their expected responsibilities on the job.

Despite the lack of challenge from the top down, 81 percent of the women who categorize themselves as very successful, said they assume added responsibilities in order to advance their own careers. They also reported learning new skills, considering new positions and regularly asking for new challenges.

Read more

iStock_000002848681XSmall_1_.jpgBy Deb Katula (Chicago)

Four Indian women are listed among the World’s 100 Most Powerful Women – two are in government, one is a self-made biotech powerhouse, and the other, Indra Nooyi, is the US-based CEO of Pepsico. Conspicuously missing are the women of India’s corporate sector.

In 1991, in an effort to combat widespread poverty, India undertook serious economic reforms, eschewing market controls and opening its economy to the world. The resulting multinational corporation mass entry into the market allowed women to enter and excel in non-traditional (i.e., not teaching or nursing), corporate professions and in banking and IT in particular.

While significant progress has been made for women in the Indian corporate world, there is a long way to go. According to a Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) source, only a handful of women sit on the boards of the 4,864 companies listed: currently only 4.9% of the 12,741 directors on the boards of these companies are women and, out of the top 100 companies listed on the BSE, only 34.7% of the directors are women.

As in most other countries, one reason for the comparatively low number of women at the top of corporations is the difficulty balancing work obligations with home obligations. In India, this is a particularly challenging issue as women are still primarily responsible for children and the home (including their in-law’s home life), whether or not they work outside the home.

The good news is that there are a handful of successful Indian businesswomen – women like Naina Lal Kidwai, Chief Executive Officer of The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation India branches; Hewlett Packard’s Managing Director Neelam Dhawan; and Jayashree Vallal from Cisco Systems, among others. These are the women who are paving the way for a new generation of businesswomen, breaking free of traditional roles and cracking India’s corporate glass ceiling.

Opportunities for training and mentoring by these successful businesswomen will pave the way into the next decade, inspiring the next generation of young women. The role of women in top positions will continue to increase as their input and ideas are tapped to ensure the continued success of India’s economic future.

iStock_000006589526XSmall_1_.jpgby Liz O’Donnell (Boston)

New data from Florida supports a disturbing trend. The number of women in top corporate jobs and on boards of directors in Florida’s top public companies has dwindled over the past few years according to the 2008 Census by Women Executive Leadership. The census studies gender diversity in the executive suite and boardroom. It was conducted by WEL (Women Executive Leadership), a Florida-based organization that advocates, educates, and connects women, in conjunction with The University of Miami School of Business Administration. WEL last conducted the survey in 2006.

According to the report, the number of board seats held by women in the top 150 Florida companies was flat compared to 2007 but slightly down compared to 2006. Last year and in 2007, women held 7.4 percent of board positions compared to 8.7 percent in 2006. That means men hold more than 92 percent of the board seats in the top 150 Florida public companies. The number of female executives rose slightly from 5.4 percent in 2006 to 7.0 percent in 2008. When comparing census data from 2004, the changes are even more dramatic. In 2004 women held 67 executive positions at Florida top public companies but in 2008 they only held 49.

Read more

by Liz O’Donnell (Boston)

Year after year, the number of female CFOs in the Fortune 1000 remains flat, or perhaps slightly down. Last summer, CFO Magazine reported that 10 female CFOS had joined the Fortune 500 and ten had left. However, only one month after they published that list, Erin Callan left her post as CFO at Lehman Brothers. Although Callan claims in interviews that the decision to leave was hers –a sacrifice as the public face of the company during a time shareholders wanted to see drastic change—most insiders believe she was ousted as a scapegoat by CEO Dick Fuld.

Susan Decker’s “departure” story involved the upward trajectory of two female executives. Decker left the CFO job at Yahoo to become president of the Internet company. Recently, however, she resigned as president when she was passed over for the CEO spot. But, the new CEO is a woman. The Internet company hired Carol Bartz, formerly of AutoDesk, to guide the struggling giant.

Another move with an interesting back story is that of Christa Davies. Davies had a high ranking position as a divisional-CFO with Microsoft. While on maternity leave, she received a call to join Aon Corp., a $10 billion company, as Executive Vice President, Global Finance. She is now Aon’s Chief Financial Officer.

Other female CFOs include Jean S. Blackwell, an attorney by training, who held many positions in Cummins, including serving as General Counsel from 1997 and Chief Financial Officer from Chief Financial Officer of Cummins Inc. from February 2003 to April 2008. Blackwell is currently serving as the Chief Executive of Cummins Foundation and Executive Vice President of Corporate Responsibility at Cummins Inc.

After 24 years with United Stationers, the last six of which as CFO of the organization, Kathleen S. Dvorak resigned from the company to “seek new challenges”. She now serves as CFO of Richardson Electronics in Illinois.

Judy C. Lewent, the first woman to serve as the CFO of a major corporation, held the position of Chief Financial Officer of Merck & Co., Inc. from 1990 until September 2007. She currently serves as co-chairman and executive vice president of Merial Limited.

The following women appear to have retired from daily corporate life:

Dianne M. Neal served as executive vice president and CFO of Reynolds American from August 2004 to December 2007. She is serving on several boards, including the Reynolds House Museum of American Art.

Patricia A. McKay was the Executive Vice President and the Chief Financial Officer of Office Depot. She held this position from October 2005 through March 2008 until she was replaced amid poor earnings reports. She had previously served as the executive vice president/CFO job with California-based Restoration Hardware.

Marianne M. Parrs served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Office of International Paper Company from November 2005 until the end of 2007. Ms. Parrs also serves on the boards of CIT Group Inc.; the Rise Foundation in Memphis, Tennessee; and the Leadership Academy in Memphis, Tennessee.

JoAnn Reed retired on March 15, 2008 after nearly 20 years at Medco Health Solutions, Inc., including 16 years as the company’s Chief Financial Officer. She is currently serving in an advisory capacity to the company through 2010.

E. Follin Smith joined Constellation Energy as senior vice president and chief financial officer. She left the company and the position of CFO to “be more actively involved with my children at this stage of their lives.”

Linda Dimopoulos started at Darden Restaurants in 1982 and was promoted from CIO to CFO in December 2002. She remained in that position until retiring June 2007 after 25 years of service to the company.

Statistics don’t lie –the percentage of women CFOs in the Fortune 500 is very small, as is the number of women across the C-suites. And while that in and of itself may not be news, it is still an important story about gender inequity in the workplace. However, the stories of women like Decker, Davies and Callan fill in some of the details of what is happening for women in corporate America.

The good news, as reported by CFO Magazine, is that there is a strong pipeline of female corporate controllers and treasurers at the top companies in the wings and in line to take the helm – women such as Joan Lordi Amble, EVP & corporate comptroller, American Express; Mary Boland, SVP & CFO, The Americas, Levi Strauss; Aileen Blake, EVP & controller, Northern Trust; Marcia Dall, VP & financial officer, Cigna Healthcare; Kim Harris Jones, VP & chief controller, Chrysler; and Teri List, VP, finance, global operations, Procter & Gamble.

iStock_000005052080XSmall_1_.jpgby Anna Collins, Esq. (Portland, Maine)

Following the election of Barack Obama, there has been an increase in discussion of how the election of the first African-American President will impact opportunities for minorities seeking to move into executive positions of leadership. In order to assess such opportunities, The Executive Leadership Council commissioned a poll of 150 executives shortly after the election.

The good news is that 75 percent of the executives believe that having minorities in senior executive positions is particularly important to providing new ideas and to better reflect the diversity of customers. The bad news is that the findings also demonstrate that African-American women face serious challenges in their climb up the corporate ladder. Thirty-one percent of the surveyed executives attribute those challenges to weaker or less strategic networks available to African-American women. Inaccurate perceptions of African-American women’s capabilities (24 percent) and work/life balance demands (23 percent) round out the top three issues cited as preventing or slowing down their rise.

Read more

crackedglass.JPGby Paige Churchman (New York City)

Have you heard of the glass cliff? It seems that, when a company is ailing, it is more likely, if ever, to tap a woman to lead. So just when a woman thinks she’s finally broken through-that at last the playing field is level-she may actually be on a dangerous precipice. More so than a man would be. Men, who are more likely to be chosen to lead successful companies, aren’t scrutinized as harshly and are less likely to be blamed for failures.

It was Michelle K. Ryan and S. Alexander Haslam who put a name to this phenomenon. In 2005 they published “The Glass Cliff: Evidence that Women are Over-Represented in Precarious Leadership Positions.” The two University of Exeter researchers wanted to find out if having women on their boards really “wreaked havoc on companies’ performance and share prices” as Elizabeth Judge said in a London Times article. Studying the FTSE 100, Ryan and Haslam found was that the said companies “had experienced consistently poor performance in the months preceding the appointment” of a woman to their boards and that share prices actually showed a “marked increase after the appointment.”

USA Today has been studying women CEOs and share price since 2003. The first two years, the female CEOs outperformed the males. But in 2005 (the year Carly Fiorina was ousted), things began to change, with women’s companies slightly underperforming those led by men. In 2006 and 2007, men and women CEOs ran even, judged by share price, and “2008 knew no gender in its devastation.”

Read more