iStock_000004780659XSmall_1_.jpgBy Heather Chapman (New York City)

U.S. companies could save upwards of $260 billion dollars a year by implementing a telework (also known as “telecommuting”) policy. So says Undress for Success, an online resource site for people who work from home. Using recently released U.S. Census figures and data from several different studies, as well as their Telework Savings Calculator, they also determined that U.S. consumers could save around $228 billion dollars a year and that the U.S. government could see $14 billion dollars in savings.

Currently, there are less than 6 million people in the U.S. who currently work from home, half of whom are not self employed. But, according to Kate Lister and Tom Harnish, publishers of the Undress for Success site, there are another 33 million people working in the U.S. whose jobs are suitable for teleworking. They say that if these people worked from home for half of the time, “businesses could improve their bottom line by over $7,900 per new telecommuter per year—the result of lower real estate, electricity, absenteeism, and turnover costs together with increased employee productivity.”

Undress for Success found that, thanks to teleworking:

Sun Microsystems saves $70 million a year in real estate alone;
McKesson saves $2 million a year in real estate and other expenses;
Dow Chemical saved a third of its non-real estate costs through telework;
Best Buy, British Telecom, JD Edwards, and American Express show home-based employees to be 20-40% more productive than their office counterparts.

Read more

iStock_000001988124XSmall_1_.jpgby Anna T. Collins, Esq. (Portland, Maine)

When President Obama signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act on January 29, 2009, critics declared the new law a pain for employers and a boon for trial lawyers. Now that it is easier for plaintiffs to file wage claims when they earn less than their counterparts, the naysayers exclaim, trial lawyers will take advantage of the new law by filing frivolous claims. Ironically, lawyers may not be merely the busy enforcers of this new law. What if they are the plaintiffs? The wage gap, after all, remains a curious reality in the legal profession.

The reality is striking at all levels of the legal profession, but especially at the equity partner level. After a 2008 survey, the National Association of Women Lawyers found that on average, women earn $7,000 less in annual pay than men at the associate level, $14,000 less if they are of-counsel, $23,000 less at the non-equity partner level, and $87,000 less if they are equity partners. In essence, women lawyers find themselves with an even shorter end of the stick as they advance further in their careers.

Paying attention to the wage gaps for lawyers is useful because of the unique nature of the profession. First, the legal profession has experienced increased female participation for the last 30 years. Before 1970, few women entered the profession. Today, women make up more than 40% of law school enrollment and represent about a quarter of the legal profession. In addition, employers are well aware that the advanced training women receive in law school is in no way different from that received by men. Due to such transparency, gender discrimination should be minimal – at least theoretically.

Read more

dollars.JPGBy Paige Churchman (New York City)

The overpaid executives have become a lightning rod for our rage. Everyone’s jumping in. The President calls them shameful. The Merrill Lynch cafeteria workers, who make about $410 a week (paid by their contractor Aramark), take to the streets with a picture of John Thain’s $87,000 area rug. The exorbitantly paid have gone from star status to villains. Not so long ago, Thain was hailed as “Mr. Fixit.”

The problem started sneaking up on us about thirty years ago. According to the Economic Policy Institute, in 1965 US CEOs in major companies earned 24 times more than the average worker. That seemed about right. The ratio had been around 20:1 for most of the twentieth century. Then in the late seventies the gap slowly began to grow, reaching 35:1 in 1979. But in the 1990s, the gap broke into a full gallop, hitting 275:1 in 2007. In other words, says the report, “a CEO earned more in one work day…than the typical worker earned all year.” Occasionally, when a study drew attention to the growing imbalance, there was some shock, but it didn’t stay on our radars. The economy was strong. A President spoke of “trickle down.” People were happy. Until the economy fell apart. Now the gall of those overpaid guys is all we hear about, and President Obama has just announced a $500,000 cap for executives at companies receiving the largest amounts of bailout money.

Read more

moneyinhand.JPGby Paige Churchman (New York City)

The first time I asked for a raise, I got it. That was way back in the 1970s. I was a secretary in an ad agency. I faced off against my boss’s boss, asking for a lot more than the $150 a week I was making. “Our secretaries don’t make over $160,” he said. “Have faith,” he said. “Lots of girls would do your job for free,” he said. Nice try, buddy. I got $175 a week and a promise for $190 (what I asked for) two months later.

Read more

dollars.JPGby Zoe Cruz (New York City)

It’s happening in affluent families all over the country. It’s “the talk.”

“Honey, now that you and Dave are getting engaged, let’s have a talk.”

“Mom, we’ve been living together for a year now…that ship has sailed.”

“No, honey, not THAT talk. Let’s talk about money.”

“Mom, can’t we talk about sex instead?”

Women and Company, a membership service provided by Citi that provides financial education and related resources intended for informational purposes, commissioned Synovate to conduct an eight-month long survey of more than 1,000 affluent women–those with household investable assets of $100K or more–between the ages of 40-70. The newly-released resulting study, Women and Affluence 2008: A Generational Study revealed that finance is now the number one topic of discussion between affluent women and their daughters.

Read more

iStock_000005581680XSmall.jpgby Paige Churchman (New York City)

With all the other news from the financial world, you might have missed this – both Fortune and Forbes have recently published their top-paid lists of businesswomen. Fortune’s is a sub list of its annual 50 Most Powerful Women in Business, published just last week, three weeks after Forbes named its 100 Highest-Paid Women In Corporate America and about a month after the Census released its 2007 figures on the U.S. wage gap between men and women.

Read more

by Heather Cassell

What if you could provide your employer with a constructive review? How about knowing what your male co-workers are earning in the same position that you hold? What if you could tap into market trends in your career?

This important career information is available—if you are willing to take the time and energy to dig for it or pay your assistant to keep you abreast of industry vicissitudes. Or you can simply open Glassdoor.com, a new free consumer-based tool launched last month for executives and employees to post, review, rate, and monitor corporate culture, top company officials anonymously, and the golden egg—salaries—all sorted from industry to career field in a user-friendly format.
Read more

Contributed by Alana Elsner

For some, the issue of social responsibility may seem new- a post-millennial development- part a new consciousness about the world around us that spurred the onslaught of hybrid vehicles and carbon credits. But for others, like the executives at Trillium Management and the Calvert Group, socially responsible investing began decades ago. Perhaps its beginnings can more accurately be traced to grassroots movements in the 1960s or to the gas crisis of 1973. Since its humble beginnings, socially responsible investing (SRI) evolved from being perceived as an eccentric offshoot of mainstream investing to a legitimate and meaningful investment strategy. But how has the recent economic downturn affected this new field of investment?

Read more

Todd Petzel of Offit Capital Advisors kicked off the Hedge World’s Managed Futures and Commodity Trading Conference last week at Chicago’s University Club. Buy side professionals gathered to discuss their investment options in the current crisis market. They listened as Petzel went through examples of failed investment approaches and the common factors each case shared.

Read more

2334619694_7965929af1_m.jpgMy mother and I were checking out of our hotel in the old city of Vienna when the receptionist behind the desk asked me if I wanted to pay in euros or dollars. I handed her my Visa and said I would pay in euros, since seeing the inflated price in dollars would only depress me. The woman agreed and handed me a bill for 330 euros. Knowing quite well that I had just spent about $600, I signed the bill quickly and pushed the amount out of my head.

Read more