Courtesey of Pro Mujer
By Melissa J. Anderson (New York City)
Last Thursday, the Financial Women’s Association of New York held an informational panel discussion on the state of microfinance in Latin America. The panel, moderated by Sheila Hooda, Senior Managing Director, TIAA-CREF, featured a broad spectrum of experts: Sandra Darville, Unit Chief, Multilateral Investment Fund (MIF) of the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB); Gary P. Kochubka, Senior Director, Standard & Poor’s (S&P); Rosario Perez, Chief Executive Officer, Pro Mujer; and Peter V. A. Shaw, Managing Director, FitchRatings.
One of the main takeaways of the event was that it’s difficult to discuss “microfinance in Latin America” because the market is so broad, with the industry taking on several stages of maturity across the region.
As Darville explained, in some areas of the region, the microfinance market is extremely developed (with over 30% penetration), while in other places, penetration is “less than 1%.”
Hooda summarized, “Microfinance originated in Latin America. A lot of institutions are very mature. Government regulation is mostly helpful…” Over the years, she explained, the industry has survived a lot of turmoil – whether hurricanes or political unrest – but, she said of the state of the industry in the past two years, “this is the first time the crisis is not [based in] Latin America – it originated in the US.”
Shaw said, “Broadly and structurally… microfinance as an industry has penetrated deeper in Latin America than in some of the other markets in which it is active today.” He explained that in the last ten years, the industry has undergone a cycle of development in which entities started largely as unregulated institutions, funded mostly by venture capital or philanthropic donations.
As the industry has grown, it has become more heavily regulated. “Non-banks transform into banks,” he explained. “Deposits are becoming more important to balance sheets.”